xAPI vs. SCORM: Which Is Right for Your Corporate Training Strategy?
- LMSPortals
- Jun 17
- 5 min read

Choosing the right standard to track and manage employee learning is crucial for any organization aiming to build an effective corporate training program. For years, SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) has been the industry standard. But with the rise of new learning technologies and remote workforces, xAPI (Experience API)—also known as Tin Can API—has emerged as a powerful alternative.
This article breaks down the key differences between xAPI and SCORM, outlines their pros and cons, and helps you decide which is the better fit for your corporate training goals.
What Are xAPI and SCORM?
SCORM: The Longtime Standard
SCORM was developed in the early 2000s by the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) initiative. It defines how online learning content and Learning Management Systems (LMSs) communicate.
SCORM allows:
Tracking of completion, pass/fail, time spent, and score
Content to launch from within an LMS
Reusability of learning modules across systems
However, SCORM is browser-based and limited to content hosted within an LMS. It’s also highly dependent on an internet connection.
xAPI: A Flexible, Modern Alternative
xAPI, also created by ADL, addresses many of SCORM’s limitations. It tracks learning experiences both online and offline, across multiple platforms, tools, and environments.
xAPI enables:
Data tracking from mobile apps, simulations, social media, and more
Recording of informal learning (e.g., mentoring, reading an article)
Use outside the LMS via Learning Record Stores (LRS)
Instead of just tracking if someone completed a course, xAPI captures detailed “statements” like: “John watched a leadership webinar for 35 minutes on a mobile device.”
Key Differences: xAPI vs. SCORM
Feature | SCORM | xAPI |
Tracking | Limited (completion, score, time) | Rich, flexible (any activity) |
Offline Capability | No | Yes |
Device Compatibility | Desktop, LMS only | Desktop, mobile, apps, VR, etc. |
Data Storage | LMS | LRS (Learning Record Store) |
Communication | JavaScript within a browser | RESTful web services |
Interoperability | Limited to SCORM-compliant LMS | Cross-platform, flexible APIs |
Content Launch | From LMS only | Anywhere: LMS, app, email, etc. |
When SCORM Makes Sense
SCORM remains relevant for many organizations with straightforward needs. It’s reliable, widely supported, and works well in traditional LMS environments.
Use SCORM if:
Your training is mostly formal and LMS-based
You don’t need to track informal or offline learning
You already have SCORM-compatible authoring tools
You prioritize ease of deployment and LMS reporting
For example, if your training program consists of compliance modules or regulatory certification courses, SCORM is probably sufficient.
Pros of SCORM:
Simple to implement
Compatible with most LMSs
Standardized format
Cost-effective for basic eLearning
Cons of SCORM:
Can’t track informal or mobile learning
No offline support
Limited analytics and learner insights
Dependent on a single LMS
When xAPI Is the Better Choice
xAPI shines in more complex, modern learning environments where learning happens beyond the LMS. It’s ideal for companies using blended learning, microlearning, or experiential learning strategies.
Use xAPI if:
Your learners engage on mobile devices, simulations, or AR/VR
You want to track learning across apps, tools, and systems
You're investing in informal learning or social learning
You want detailed analytics to improve learning outcomes
For example, sales teams using CRM-integrated training, or engineers using AR-based troubleshooting tools, would benefit greatly from xAPI's tracking capabilities.
Pros of xAPI:
Tracks learning anywhere, anytime
Enables offline learning
Supports mobile and immersive content
Provides granular learning data
Works across platforms and systems
Cons of xAPI:
Requires an LRS to store data
More complex to implement
May need custom development
Not all authoring tools support it out of the box
Real-World Scenarios: SCORM vs. xAPI
Scenario 1: Traditional Compliance Training
Use SCORM.
If your workforce needs to complete annual compliance training that is LMS-based and tested, SCORM works fine. It’s fast to deploy, widely supported, and meets regulatory standards.
Scenario 2: Field Service Training with Mobile Devices
Use xAPI.
If your technicians use tablets and smartphones to access training while on the job, xAPI is the clear winner. It tracks learning offline and integrates with performance systems.
Scenario 3: Leadership Development Through Coaching and Content
Use xAPI.
Coaching sessions, peer learning, and reading business articles don’t live in an LMS. xAPI can capture all these informal experiences and give you a broader view of development.
Implementation Considerations
Infrastructure
SCORM: Minimal setup if using a SCORM-compliant LMS.
xAPI: Requires a Learning Record Store (LRS) and potentially more technical setup.
Authoring Tools
Most major eLearning tools like Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate support both SCORM and xAPI, but advanced xAPI functionality may require custom coding or configuration.
Cost and Resources
SCORM: Generally lower cost and faster to implement.
xAPI: May involve higher initial costs due to infrastructure, LRS integration, and custom development.
Blending SCORM and xAPI
Some organizations use a hybrid approach: SCORM for basic course deployment and xAPI for richer tracking. For example, they might use SCORM to deliver content in the LMS but embed xAPI calls to track interactions within simulations or external apps.
This allows companies to meet compliance requirements while still gaining insights from advanced learning analytics.
The Future of Learning Standards
The learning landscape is evolving quickly. Mobile learning, AR/VR, AI tutors, and data-driven personalization are becoming common. SCORM is increasingly seen as restrictive in these environments.
xAPI is designed for this future. It allows organizations to capture, analyze, and optimize learning in ways SCORM never could. As learning becomes more continuous and embedded in work, xAPI is likely to become the backbone of next-gen corporate training ecosystems.
Summary: Which One Should You Choose?
Go with SCORM if:
Your training is LMS-centric and mostly formal
You don’t need detailed analytics or mobile/offline support
You want quick, low-cost deployment
Choose xAPI if:
You need to track learning across multiple platforms and formats
You're investing in mobile, blended, or experiential learning
You want deeper analytics and better ROI measurement
For many modern businesses, xAPI is the better long-term investment, especially as the workforce becomes more distributed, learning becomes more personalized, and analytics take center stage.
But if you're not ready for that leap, SCORM still offers a reliable foundation. The smartest move may be to start with SCORM, then phase in xAPI capabilities where it makes the biggest impact.
Bottom Line: SCORM is the old reliable. xAPI is the future-ready tool. Your corporate training strategy should reflect not just where your company is now, but where it’s going.
About LMS Portals
At LMS Portals, we provide our clients and partners with a mobile-responsive, SaaS-based, multi-tenant learning management system that allows you to launch a dedicated training environment (a portal) for each of your unique audiences.
The system includes built-in, SCORM-compliant rapid course development software that provides a drag and drop engine to enable most anyone to build engaging courses quickly and easily.
We also offer a complete library of ready-made courses, covering most every aspect of corporate training and employee development.
If you choose to, you can create Learning Paths to deliver courses in a logical progression and add structure to your training program. The system also supports Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) and provides tools for social learning.
Together, these features make LMS Portals the ideal SaaS-based eLearning platform for our clients and our Reseller partners.
Contact us today to get started or visit our Partner Program pages
Comments