top of page

xAPI vs. SCORM: Which Is Right for Your Corporate Training Strategy?

xAPI vs. SCORM: Which Is Right for Corporate Training

Choosing the right standard to track and manage employee learning is crucial for any organization aiming to build an effective corporate training program. For years, SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) has been the industry standard. But with the rise of new learning technologies and remote workforces, xAPI (Experience API)—also known as Tin Can API—has emerged as a powerful alternative.


This article breaks down the key differences between xAPI and SCORM, outlines their pros and cons, and helps you decide which is the better fit for your corporate training goals.



What Are xAPI and SCORM?


SCORM: The Longtime Standard

SCORM was developed in the early 2000s by the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) initiative. It defines how online learning content and Learning Management Systems (LMSs) communicate.


SCORM allows:

  • Tracking of completion, pass/fail, time spent, and score

  • Content to launch from within an LMS

  • Reusability of learning modules across systems


However, SCORM is browser-based and limited to content hosted within an LMS. It’s also highly dependent on an internet connection.


xAPI: A Flexible, Modern Alternative

xAPI, also created by ADL, addresses many of SCORM’s limitations. It tracks learning experiences both online and offline, across multiple platforms, tools, and environments.


xAPI enables:

  • Data tracking from mobile apps, simulations, social media, and more

  • Recording of informal learning (e.g., mentoring, reading an article)

  • Use outside the LMS via Learning Record Stores (LRS)


Instead of just tracking if someone completed a course, xAPI captures detailed “statements” like: “John watched a leadership webinar for 35 minutes on a mobile device.”


Key Differences: xAPI vs. SCORM

Feature

SCORM

xAPI

Tracking

Limited (completion, score, time)

Rich, flexible (any activity)

Offline Capability

No

Yes

Device Compatibility

Desktop, LMS only

Desktop, mobile, apps, VR, etc.

Data Storage

LMS

LRS (Learning Record Store)

Communication

JavaScript within a browser

RESTful web services

Interoperability

Limited to SCORM-compliant LMS

Cross-platform, flexible APIs

Content Launch

From LMS only

Anywhere: LMS, app, email, etc.

When SCORM Makes Sense

SCORM remains relevant for many organizations with straightforward needs. It’s reliable, widely supported, and works well in traditional LMS environments.


Use SCORM if:

  • Your training is mostly formal and LMS-based

  • You don’t need to track informal or offline learning

  • You already have SCORM-compatible authoring tools

  • You prioritize ease of deployment and LMS reporting


For example, if your training program consists of compliance modules or regulatory certification courses, SCORM is probably sufficient.


Pros of SCORM:

  • Simple to implement

  • Compatible with most LMSs

  • Standardized format

  • Cost-effective for basic eLearning


Cons of SCORM:

  • Can’t track informal or mobile learning

  • No offline support

  • Limited analytics and learner insights

  • Dependent on a single LMS


When xAPI Is the Better Choice

xAPI shines in more complex, modern learning environments where learning happens beyond the LMS. It’s ideal for companies using blended learning, microlearning, or experiential learning strategies.


Use xAPI if:

  • Your learners engage on mobile devices, simulations, or AR/VR

  • You want to track learning across apps, tools, and systems

  • You're investing in informal learning or social learning

  • You want detailed analytics to improve learning outcomes


For example, sales teams using CRM-integrated training, or engineers using AR-based troubleshooting tools, would benefit greatly from xAPI's tracking capabilities.


Pros of xAPI:

  • Tracks learning anywhere, anytime

  • Enables offline learning

  • Supports mobile and immersive content

  • Provides granular learning data

  • Works across platforms and systems


Cons of xAPI:

  • Requires an LRS to store data

  • More complex to implement

  • May need custom development

  • Not all authoring tools support it out of the box


Real-World Scenarios: SCORM vs. xAPI

Scenario 1: Traditional Compliance Training


Use SCORM.

If your workforce needs to complete annual compliance training that is LMS-based and tested, SCORM works fine. It’s fast to deploy, widely supported, and meets regulatory standards.


Scenario 2: Field Service Training with Mobile Devices


Use xAPI.

If your technicians use tablets and smartphones to access training while on the job, xAPI is the clear winner. It tracks learning offline and integrates with performance systems.


Scenario 3: Leadership Development Through Coaching and Content


Use xAPI.

Coaching sessions, peer learning, and reading business articles don’t live in an LMS. xAPI can capture all these informal experiences and give you a broader view of development.


Implementation Considerations

Infrastructure

  • SCORM: Minimal setup if using a SCORM-compliant LMS.

  • xAPI: Requires a Learning Record Store (LRS) and potentially more technical setup.


Authoring Tools

Most major eLearning tools like Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate support both SCORM and xAPI, but advanced xAPI functionality may require custom coding or configuration.


Cost and Resources

  • SCORM: Generally lower cost and faster to implement.

  • xAPI: May involve higher initial costs due to infrastructure, LRS integration, and custom development.


Blending SCORM and xAPI

Some organizations use a hybrid approach: SCORM for basic course deployment and xAPI for richer tracking. For example, they might use SCORM to deliver content in the LMS but embed xAPI calls to track interactions within simulations or external apps.

This allows companies to meet compliance requirements while still gaining insights from advanced learning analytics.


The Future of Learning Standards

The learning landscape is evolving quickly. Mobile learning, AR/VR, AI tutors, and data-driven personalization are becoming common. SCORM is increasingly seen as restrictive in these environments.


xAPI is designed for this future. It allows organizations to capture, analyze, and optimize learning in ways SCORM never could. As learning becomes more continuous and embedded in work, xAPI is likely to become the backbone of next-gen corporate training ecosystems.


Summary: Which One Should You Choose?


Go with SCORM if:

  • Your training is LMS-centric and mostly formal

  • You don’t need detailed analytics or mobile/offline support

  • You want quick, low-cost deployment


Choose xAPI if:

  • You need to track learning across multiple platforms and formats

  • You're investing in mobile, blended, or experiential learning

  • You want deeper analytics and better ROI measurement


For many modern businesses, xAPI is the better long-term investment, especially as the workforce becomes more distributed, learning becomes more personalized, and analytics take center stage.


But if you're not ready for that leap, SCORM still offers a reliable foundation. The smartest move may be to start with SCORM, then phase in xAPI capabilities where it makes the biggest impact.


Bottom Line: SCORM is the old reliable. xAPI is the future-ready tool. Your corporate training strategy should reflect not just where your company is now, but where it’s going.


About LMS Portals

At LMS Portals, we provide our clients and partners with a mobile-responsive, SaaS-based, multi-tenant learning management system that allows you to launch a dedicated training environment (a portal) for each of your unique audiences.


The system includes built-in, SCORM-compliant rapid course development software that provides a drag and drop engine to enable most anyone to build engaging courses quickly and easily. 


We also offer a complete library of ready-made courses, covering most every aspect of corporate training and employee development.


If you choose to, you can create Learning Paths to deliver courses in a logical progression and add structure to your training program.  The system also supports Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) and provides tools for social learning.


Together, these features make LMS Portals the ideal SaaS-based eLearning platform for our clients and our Reseller partners.


Contact us today to get started or visit our Partner Program pages

Comments


bottom of page