Employee training is a critical component of business success, ensuring that employees stay up-to-date with industry trends, improve their skills, and remain engaged in their work. However, organizations often face a major decision: should they conduct training in-house or outsource it to external providers? The answer to this question depends on various factors, including cost, efficiency, scalability, and return on investment (ROI).
This article will delve into the numbers behind employee training, comparing in-house programs with outsourced training to help organizations make data-driven decisions. We will explore costs, effectiveness, employee engagement, long-term benefits, and hidden expenses associated with each approach.
The Cost Comparison: In-House vs. Outsourced Training
Cost is often the first factor organizations consider when choosing between in-house and outsourced training programs. While the initial costs of in-house training may seem lower, the long-term expenses can vary significantly.
In-House Training Costs
In-house training refers to programs developed, managed, and delivered by internal staff. This approach involves various expenses, such as:
Trainer Salaries: If an organization hires full-time trainers, their salaries add to fixed costs. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, corporate trainers earn an average of $64,000 per year.
Training Materials: Companies need to create materials such as manuals, e-learning modules, and software tools. Developing these from scratch can cost anywhere from $5,000 to $50,000, depending on complexity.
Technology & Infrastructure: Implementing a Learning Management System (LMS) for tracking progress can range from $5,000 to $100,000 annually, depending on the system’s scale and features.
Lost Productivity: Employees conducting training must take time away from their regular tasks. If a senior employee earning $80,000 per year spends 10% of their time training others, this amounts to $8,000 in lost productivity annually per trainer.
Outsourced Training Costs
Outsourced training involves hiring third-party vendors to conduct training sessions, either virtually or in-person. These costs include:
Per-Employee Fees: Many providers charge per employee, ranging from $100 to $1,500 per session, depending on the subject matter and expertise required.
Customized Training Programs: Custom-designed training can cost anywhere from $10,000 to $100,000, depending on the level of personalization and industry requirements.
Subscription-Based E-Learning: Online platforms like LMS Portals offer corporate packages ranging from $300 to $1,500 per employee annually.
Cost Summary: If a company with 500 employees invests in a custom in-house training program costing $50,000 and an LMS costing $20,000 annually, the total cost is $70,000 per year, excluding trainer salaries. Outsourcing the same training at $500 per employee would amount to $250,000 annually. While outsourcing appears costlier upfront, it may reduce hidden costs such as content development, administrative overhead, and internal labor costs.
Effectiveness & ROI of Training Programs
Organizations must measure training effectiveness to determine which approach provides better ROI. Key metrics include knowledge retention, employee performance improvement, and time-to-competency.
In-House Training Effectiveness
Pros:
Customization: In-house training aligns with company culture and specific job roles.
Continuous Learning: Employees can receive on-the-job guidance from internal trainers.
Direct Control: Companies can modify training based on immediate feedback.
Cons:
Limited Expertise: Internal trainers may not always have specialized knowledge.
Resource-Intensive: It requires significant time and effort to update materials.
Outsourced Training Effectiveness
Pros:
Industry Expertise: External trainers bring specialized knowledge and insights.
Scalability: Training can be delivered quickly to a large workforce.
Certification & Credibility: Third-party certifications enhance employee credentials.
Cons:
Generic Content: May not always align with company-specific needs.
Less Control: Organizations have less flexibility in modifying training content.
According to a study by the Association for Talent Development (ATD), companies that invested in outsourced training saw a 24% improvement in employee performance, compared to a 17% improvement in in-house training. This suggests that while both approaches yield positive outcomes, outsourced training often provides higher expertise-driven value.
Scalability & Flexibility Considerations
One of the biggest challenges companies face is scaling training programs as they grow.
In-House Training Scalability
Limited by Resources: In-house programs depend on available trainers, making rapid expansion difficult.
High Maintenance: Training content needs frequent updates to stay relevant.
Logistical Challenges: Scheduling sessions across multiple locations can be complex.
Outsourced Training Scalability
Easier to Scale: Large training firms can accommodate thousands of employees quickly.
Remote & On-Demand Learning: Digital training platforms enable flexible learning schedules.
Lower Incremental Cost: Scaling up does not require hiring additional internal trainers.
A 2022 LinkedIn Workplace Learning Report found that 80% of companies using outsourced e-learning platforms experienced a 30% reduction in training deployment time, demonstrating the efficiency of third-party solutions for rapid scaling.
Employee Engagement & Learning Retention
Engagement levels directly impact how well employees absorb and apply knowledge.
In-House Training Engagement Levels
Personalized Learning: Employees may feel more connected to internal trainers.
Stronger Workplace Culture: Encourages interaction within the company.
Higher Participation in Hands-On Training: Employees engage better in real-world simulations.
However, internal training can become repetitive, leading to disengagement over time.
Outsourced Training Engagement Levels
Fresh Perspectives: External trainers bring new teaching methods.
Gamification & Interactive Content: Many vendors use AI-driven personalization and engagement tools.
Diverse Learning Formats: Video-based learning, VR simulations, and AI-driven content improve retention.
Research by the Brandon Hall Group shows that organizations using outsourced, interactive training methods saw a 30% higher knowledge retention rate than those using traditional in-house methods.
Hidden Costs & Long-Term Investment
While initial costs are crucial, companies must also consider hidden expenses and long-term impacts.
Hidden Costs of In-House Training
Trainer Turnover: If a lead trainer leaves, knowledge gaps may occur.
Compliance & Certification Costs: Keeping programs updated with industry regulations.
Administrative Overhead: HR teams must allocate time to manage training logistics.
Hidden Costs of Outsourced Training
Integration with Internal Processes: Some outsourced training may not align with existing workflows.
Customization Fees: Some vendors charge extra for tailored content.
Dependence on Third-Party Providers: A vendor going out of business could disrupt learning continuity.
Long-term studies show that blended training approaches, combining in-house and outsourced methods, yield the best results. A 2021 Training Industry Report found that companies using both approaches saw a 35% higher employee retention rate, as employees benefited from both internal alignment and external expertise.
Summary: Finding the Right Balance
The decision between in-house and outsourced training depends on multiple factors, including budget, industry needs, and company growth plans.
In-house training is ideal for highly customized, culture-specific learning but requires ongoing investment in trainers and content development.
Outsourced training provides industry-leading expertise, scalability, and higher engagement but comes with higher per-employee costs.
Ultimately, a blended learning approach—where foundational training is handled in-house while specialized or large-scale training is outsourced—can provide the best return on investment.
By evaluating cost structures, engagement rates, scalability, and hidden expenses, businesses can craft a training strategy that maximizes employee growth and organizational success.
About LMS Portals
At LMS Portals, we provide our clients and partners with a mobile-responsive, SaaS-based, multi-tenant learning management system that allows you to launch a dedicated training environment (a portal) for each of your unique audiences.
The system includes built-in, SCORM-compliant rapid course development software that provides a drag and drop engine to enable most anyone to build engaging courses quickly and easily.
We also offer a complete library of ready-made courses, covering most every aspect of corporate training and employee development.
If you choose to, you can create Learning Paths to deliver courses in a logical progression and add structure to your training program. The system also supports Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) and provides tools for social learning.
Together, these features make LMS Portals the ideal SaaS-based eLearning platform for our clients and our Reseller partners.
Contact us today to get started or visit our Partner Program pages
Comments